Service in formation — not yet live Founding-cohort briefings open for 2027

AI attacks
move at machine
speed. Hold
the wall.

Your models, agents, and data are now a perimeter — and the things probing it are other models: tireless, adaptive, and cheap to run. A firewall from 2015 will not save you. A fort might.

DataFort is an AI safety and counter-AI attack practice. We audit your AI the way an attacker’s AI would, guard it at runtime, and — when the probing turns into an assault — we answer machines with machines: decoys, tarpits, and honey models inside your own walls, every countermeasure under human command.

Live-fire range · simulation
0 probes launched
0 stopped at the wall
0 got inside

An illustration of the idea, not telemetry: automated probes arrive from the left; the wall inspects and turns them away before they reach the keep. Rampart, below, is the real version of this picture.

4defensive layers, from prompt surface to raw data
6attack classes covered, mapped below
1human commander signs off on every countermeasure
0actions taken beyond your own perimeter. Ever.

The siege catalogue

Six ways a machine comes at your machines

These are not hypothetical. Each one is a documented pattern of attack against production AI — and each one has a counter. This is the map we work from.

/01

Prompt injection

Instructions smuggled into web pages, documents, emails, or tool output hijack your model mid-task — it obeys the attacker’s text instead of yours.

Counter

Injection test batteries against every input channel, plus runtime separation of trusted instructions from untrusted content.

/02

Agent hijacking

An autonomous agent with tools — email, payments, code, databases — is steered step by step into doing the attacker’s work with your credentials.

Counter

The Agent Leash: tool allowlists, spend and step limits, and human gates on irreversible actions, enforced outside the model.

/03

Data exfiltration

Patient, ordinary-looking questions walk your training data, system prompts, customer records, or RAG corpus out through the chat window.

Counter

Egress watch on outputs, canary records planted in your corpus, and extraction-pattern detection across sessions — not just single prompts.

/04

Model extraction & cloning

A competitor or scraper queries your API systematically and trains a copy of your model — your R&D, rebuilt from your own answers.

Counter

Query-pattern throttling, output watermarking, and honey models: decoy endpoints that feed the cloner subtly wrong answers.

/05

Synthetic impersonation

Cloned voices and faces of your executives, staff, or customers authorize payments, reset credentials, and talk their way past your people.

Counter

Provenance checks and out-of-band challenge protocols for high-stakes requests — a verification drill your team actually rehearses.

/06

Autonomous attack swarms

Not one attacker but a fleet: agents that probe, learn from each refusal, rephrase, and return — a siege that never sleeps and never gets bored.

Counter

Counterbattery operations: tarpits that waste swarm compute, decoy surfaces that absorb the assault, and defenses that adapt between waves.

The garrison

Three services. One wall.

Engage one, or stack all three. Every engagement starts with the audit — you cannot defend a perimeter you have not walked.

Service 01 · Assess

Bastion Audit

A fixed-scope AI safety assessment run the way an attacker’s model would run it: automated probing at scale, then human analysts on the findings.

Fixed scope · typically 3–5 weeks · report + retest

What you receive

  • Perimeter map — every model, agent, tool, and data source an attacker can reach, drawn as one attack surface.
  • Live-fire test battery — injection, exfiltration, and jailbreak campaigns against your real systems, in a controlled window.
  • Agent authority review — what your agents can actually do with their tools, and what a hijacked one could do.
  • Findings register — each weakness with reproduction evidence, severity, and a fix your engineers can act on.
  • Retest — we attack the fixes once, on the record, before the report closes.
Service 02 · Guard

Rampart

Runtime defense that sits on the wall while your AI works: watching inputs and outputs, enforcing the Agent Leash, and raising the alarm in evidence-grade detail.

Standing service · monthly retainer · 24/7 watch floor

What stands guard

  • Prompt & output shield — injection and exfiltration patterns inspected in both directions, tuned to your traffic.
  • The Agent Leash — hard limits on tool use, spend, and steps that no prompt, however clever, can talk its way past.
  • Canary data — planted records that phone home if your corpus is ever walked out.
  • Evidence-grade logging — every blocked attempt preserved in a form your lawyers and insurers can use.
  • Watch floor — analysts review what the machines flag; the machines never get the final word.
Service 03 · Counter-attack

Counterbattery

When defense alone is losing, we make attacking you expensive. Counter-AI operations run inside your perimeter only — deception, delay, and disruption aimed at the attacker’s machines.

Activated per campaign · human commander required · rules of engagement in writing

Countermeasures

  • Honey models & decoy endpoints — convincing fakes that absorb extraction campaigns and return subtly corrupted answers.
  • Tarpits — responses engineered to burn an attacking swarm’s time and compute budget instead of yours.
  • Attacker-model disruption — inputs crafted so automated probes misclassify your systems and misreport your defenses.
  • Attribution support — fingerprints of tools, prompts, and infrastructure, packaged for your legal and law-enforcement routes.
  • After-action review — what the assault revealed, and what changes before the next one.

Doctrine

Rules the garrison does not break

Counter-AI work lives one bad decision away from becoming the thing it fights. These four rules are written into every engagement, before any tooling is discussed.

RULE I

Nothing leaves the walls

Every countermeasure operates inside systems you own or control. We do not strike back at outside infrastructure, pursue attackers onto third-party systems, or “hack back.” Deception is lawful inside your own fort; it stops at your gate.

RULE II

A human commands

Machines probe, flag, and hold. A named human commander authorizes every active countermeasure, can halt one mid-flight, and answers for it afterward. No autonomous retaliation, no unattended escalation.

RULE III

Evidence over theatre

If it isn’t logged, it didn’t happen. Every probe, block, and countermeasure is recorded to a standard that survives scrutiny — from your board, your insurer, or a courtroom.

RULE IV

Model-agnostic, always

We defend whatever you run — frontier APIs, open weights, fine-tunes, agents built in-house. DataFort sells no model and takes no side in anyone else’s stack, so our findings never bend toward a product.

Defense builder

Sketch your wall in a minute

Tell us what you run and what you fear. The builder assembles a starting posture and drafts your briefing request — copy it or download it, and bring it to a founding-cohort conversation.

Step 1What are you defending?

Step 2Which attacks keep you up at night?

Recommended posture
Unsurveyed

Pick at least one asset and one threat, and the wall takes shape.

Your stack will appear here — audit first, then the layers your selections call for.

Questions from the gate

Before you knock

Is DataFort actually operating yet?

No — honestly. DataFort is a service in formation. The practice, methods, and doctrine on this page are the real design; the client roster is not. We are holding founding-cohort briefings for a small number of organizations ahead of a 2027 launch, and founding clients will shape the standing services.

Who is behind DataFort?

Brian Guye — AI Architect and Engineer. DataFort is founded and led by Brian Guye, a principal AI architect who designs and builds enterprise systems as an independent consultant inside client teams. His current work is production agentic AI: multi-agent orchestration, custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) tooling, retrieval-augmented generation over enterprise data, and evaluation gates for regulated clients, spanning AWS and Microsoft Azure.

That background — eight years as an architect in EMC’s Documentum consulting division, then cloud and solutions architecture across finance, defense, and healthcare, including Fortune 100 and US military clients — is the ground DataFort stands on. The same discipline that hardened enterprise content and cloud platforms now gets pointed at a newer perimeter: your models, your agents, and the data behind them.

View Brian Guye’s web résumé

“Counter-AI attack” — do you hack the attackers back?

No. Counterbattery works entirely inside your own perimeter: decoy models, honey endpoints, and tarpits that waste an attacker’s compute and feed their extraction pipelines corrupted results. Nothing we do touches systems you don’t own. It is the difference between a castle’s murder holes and riding out to burn a village — we build murder holes.

How is this different from a standard AI red team?

A red team visits, tests, and leaves a report. DataFort starts there — the Bastion Audit is that visit — but Rampart stays on the wall afterward, and Counterbattery answers live assaults while they are happening. Most AI attacks are campaigns, not events; the defense has to be a garrison, not a guest.

Which models and platforms do you cover?

Whatever you run. Frontier APIs, open-weight models, fine-tunes, retrieval systems, and agent frameworks — the attack classes in the siege catalogue apply across all of them, and the audit is built per-stack. We sell no model and resell no platform.

What do you need from us to start an audit?

An inventory of your AI systems (we will help you build it if it doesn’t exist), a test window, and one engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. Everything runs under NDA, in writing, with rules of engagement agreed before the first probe is sent.

What does it cost?

The Bastion Audit is fixed-scope and quoted after a scoping call — the price depends on the size of the perimeter, nothing else. Rampart is a monthly retainer; Counterbattery is activated per campaign. Founding-cohort terms are set during briefings, not published, because the cohort is small by design.

The siege is automated. Your defense should be a fort, not a hope.

Founding-cohort briefings are open now. Build your stack in the defense builder, bring the briefing request with you, and we will walk your perimeter together.

Start with the defense builder
← Back to DataFort DataFort · Web résumé · Short history

Web résumé

Brian Guye

Principal AI Architect  |  Cloud / Solutions Architect

AI Architect and Engineer. This is the short-history web edition — career highlights and current practice, without contact details.

Professional summary

Principal AI Architect designing and building enterprise systems as an independent consultant inside client teams. Current work is production agentic AI across a multi-vertical client portfolio, anchored by a healthcare cloud platform for a major US medical laboratory provider: multi-agent orchestration, custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) tooling, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) over enterprise data, and evaluation gates for regulated clients, spanning Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure. Background spans finance, defense, and healthcare delivery, including Fortune 100 and US military clients. Publishes applied AI architecture research.

Core skills

  • AI Architecture: Agentic workflows, multi-agent orchestration, custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, tool / function calling, human-in-the-loop approval gates, reference architectures, architecture decision records
  • LLM Engineering & Evaluation: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), hybrid search and reranking, vector stores, golden datasets, LLM-as-judge calibration, regression suites, model routing, fine-tuning and distillation of small open-source models
  • Cloud & Platform: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure (Azure OpenAI, Container Apps, Function Apps), Google Cloud Platform, Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, Ansible, VMware ESXi, KVM, OnApp, SolusVM
  • Data & Integration: PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB (Galera clustering), Percona, Microsoft SQL Server, REST APIs, event-driven architectures, FastAPI, ETL and data migrations
  • Languages: Python, Bash, Go (working knowledge), PHP, JavaScript, SQL

Professional experience

Principal AI Architect — Innoscale

Jun 2022 — Present

AI architecture and hands-on build across enterprise client engagements, anchored by a healthcare cloud platform.

  • Set AI architecture direction for the platform, including which problems go to a model and which stay in deterministic code, decided on cost and reliability grounds.
  • Built an agentic AI platform hosting frontier and open-source models on central servers, with an orchestrator coordinating sub-agents across Linux and Windows; the platform spans AWS, Microsoft Azure, OnApp, and SolusVM.
  • Wrote custom MCP servers exposing tickets, virtual machine (VM) provisioning, Ansible, DNS, email, monitoring, and backups as agent tools; a FastAPI layer brokers every call to the platform.
  • Built the AI augmentation work on top of it: LLM-assisted workflows, RAG retrieval with vector-store integration, and fine-tuning and distillation of small open-source models so privacy-sensitive workloads run cheaply on self-hosted systems.
  • Picked the model and the integration pattern for each use case, weighing frontier models on provider APIs against open-source models on private servers on cost and latency.
  • Set evaluation standards and release gates for the platform’s AI services, including golden datasets and judge calibration, and defined quality bars for agent behavior in production support work.
  • Wrote reference architectures for private model hosting, managed compute, and managed storage, and the full business case, financial model, and operating plan for a proposed AI Solutions Architect line of business.
  • Client delivery alongside the platform work: a global ride-sharing and delivery platform, an IoT monitoring platform, a media and publishing group, and a data-center and colocation operator.

Solutions Architect and Engineer — Conseev

Nov 2014 — May 2022
  • Owned architecture and delivery for a large-scale search platform: crawler, index, and query infrastructure serving very high query volumes each day.
  • Moved core services from bare-metal and hypervisor-only hosting into hybrid VM and container workloads, so each service gained elasticity and independent scaling.
  • Designed database clusters on MariaDB Galera and Percona with automated failover at the index-adjacent data tier; built multi-tier web stacks (Apache, Nginx, LiteSpeed) tuned for high-concurrency query profiles.
  • Built the abuse-prevention architecture and led incident response for compromised sites: forensics, containment, remediation, and hardening after each incident.
  • Ran complex migrations of servers, websites, and database backends across providers, and from on-premises to cloud.

Principal Architect, Independent Contract Practice (project-based)

Contract / Consulting

Independent contract practice, project-based; runs alongside the principal roles above. Clients described by vertical where names sit under NDA.

  • Consulted in regulated and high-availability environments for major North American airlines, health insurance carriers, and healthcare providers with HIPAA-adjacent workloads.
  • Also: clinical biotech firms and medical device companies, on infrastructure for research computing and device data platforms.
  • Engagement types: hybrid- and multi-cloud migrations, high-availability cluster design, security reviews and system hardening, regulated-environment infrastructure, and cost optimization.

Earlier experience

Solutions Architect and Engineer — Thunderbox

  • Owned architecture and technical delivery for a multi-brand hosting portfolio: one large media hosting brand, plus separate shared-hosting and VPS brands.
  • Designed and deployed two platforms end to end — VPS hosting on SolusVM and blog hosting on cPanel and CloudLinux — covering capacity planning, network design, deployment automation, and customer migration; unified the brands onto one corporate infrastructure (WHMCS billing, DNS, workflow tooling, email) and consolidated billing across multiple data centers.

Solutions Architect and Engineer — EMC Consulting

  • Designed and delivered on-site enterprise implementations for Fortune 100, US military, and US government clients, centered on the Documentum platform and EMC storage; ran each project end to end, from requirements to production cutover, with full technical documentation.
  • Named the division’s internal expert for Linux implementations and for VMware-hosted solutions in regulated environments.
  • Selected projects: engineering document management for a major semiconductor manufacturer; scanning and document management for a major airline’s maintenance records; a CM/ODE replacement for one of the world’s largest banking firms; a data and business-process system for a federal customer at the US Capitol.

Project Management and Consulting

  • Technical project management and enterprise consulting roles, including delivery for banking, airline, semiconductor, healthcare, and federal clients.

Selected projects & research

  • Foundational AI research program: Authored and published seven research briefs on applied AI architecture (2026), pairing classical methods with modern production use: Dempster-Shafer evidence fusion, case-based reasoning, truth maintenance, hyperdimensional computing, Soar-style plan chunking, and reservoir-computing tripwires.
  • Built a Dempster-Shafer evidence-fusion prototype for multi-source judgment; scored competing judges with Brier scores across phased trials and compared fusion output against the strongest single judge on identical cases. The Phase 3 bar was not met and the harness stays a prototype, reported as such in the project notes.
  • Agent infrastructure, self-directed: Built a coordination system for AI agents with shared task rooms, watcher wake-ups, and a warden service monitoring the rooms for rule compliance; also a case-memory system storing solved operations problems so agents retrieve prior cases before repeating covered routines.
  • Hyperdimensional computing research: Built and evaluated a hyperdimensional computing fingerprint index for agent memory: 10,000-dimension hypervectors proposing retrieval candidates beside the exact store, with shadow-mode recall measured against exact search.
  • Private infrastructure behind the project work: Roughly 30 containerized services under Docker Compose, FastAPI, Go, and Node backends, nginx reverse proxy with automated TLS, and RAID-backed storage.

Education

A.A.S., Computer Science — El Centro College

Short-history web edition. Full history available on request through a DataFort founding-cohort briefing.

Back to DataFort